<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E-Democracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy</link>
	<description>Creative ways to increase citizen participation in online public services</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Government 2.0: how social media could transform government PR</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-20-how-social-media-could-transform-government-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-20-how-social-media-could-transform-government-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate/forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[political action]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long article by PBS&#8217;s Mark Dupreau:
&#8220;It&#8217;s easy to see governments as nameless, faceless monoliths, something impersonal or, even worse, untrustworthy. Much of that is because government culture remains steeped in traditional ideas about public relations and outreach work, notions that have become archaic in an Internet-enabled, hyper-connected world. Just as private companies are learning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/personal_media225x350.jpg" alt="Personal media" title="Personal media" width="230" height="225" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />A long article by PBS&#8217;s Mark Dupreau:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s easy to see governments as nameless, faceless monoliths, something impersonal or, even worse, untrustworthy. Much of that is because government culture remains steeped in traditional ideas about public relations and outreach work, notions that have become archaic in an Internet-enabled, hyper-connected world. Just as private companies are learning to embrace social media to manage brand reputations, governments must adapt if they wish to effectively communicate with their &#8220;customers&#8221; &#8212; a.k.a. their citizens and stakeholders.</p>
<p>I propose that using authentic and transparent personalities as public outreach ambassadors can help transform &#8220;government for the people&#8221; to &#8220;government with the people.&#8221; This should also have an indirect positive effect on the government organizations &#8212; the brands &#8212; they represent.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2009/01/government-20-how-social-media-could-transform-gov-pr005.html">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-20-how-social-media-could-transform-government-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen participation and the internet in urban planning</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/citizen-participation-and-the-internet-in-urban-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/citizen-participation-and-the-internet-in-urban-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 08:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citizen participation and the internet in urban planning
In this final paper for the Masters of Community Planning degree at the University of Maryland, Rob Goodspeed decided to focus on the history and theory of participation to guide the development of a new model. How have urban planners engaged with the public in the past? What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://goodspeedupdate.com/citizen-participation-and-the-internet-in-urban-planning">Citizen participation and the internet in urban planning</a></strong></p>
<p>In this final paper for the Masters of Community Planning degree at the University of Maryland, Rob Goodspeed decided to focus on the history and theory of participation to guide the development of a new model. How have urban planners engaged with the public in the past? What academic theory and professional values guide conventional (offline) participation processes? He then use his findings to describe both why and how the Internet should be used by urban planners. He also translated the paper’s ideas into a series of blog posts published Summer 2008.</p>
<blockquote><p>The paper contains four parts. </p>
<p>First, Goodspeed describes public participation in urban planning in the context of e-government, or “the use of information technology to support government operations, engage citizens, and provide government services.” The use of the Internet to engage citizens in urban planning has been constrained by the limited availability of suitable technical tools and concerns about digital inequality, as well as a lack of a clear understanding of how technology can meet the needs of citizens and professionals. He describes how new Internet technologies and expanding Internet access addresses these concerns, and why urban planning requires a distinct technological approach from other e-government initiatives. </p>
<p>Second, he reviews the history of participation in American urban planning in order to describe an early, expansive approach to public involvement useful today. Before winning government powers over private actions, early planners communicated directly with citizens in order to build the political support necessary to achieve their plans. Model enabling acts adopted widely by many states as the framework for planning and zoning defined the legal context for official participation practices. Contemporary outreach can build from these early models using Internet tools to achieve consensus about and coordination of new urban development. </p>
<p>Third, the paper describes the theoretical framework of professional planning for participation. Since the late 1960s the definition and rationale for public participation in planning has been intensely debated in professional literature. In recent years, new models of participation have been proposed and professional approaches solidified. The theoretical debates and professional practice of offline public participation can provide perspective and values for a new Internet-centered model.</p>
<p>The paper concludes with a description of a new model of the use of Internet technology for public participation. The Internet is a powerful tool for planners to expand the base of participants in planning processes and enhance traditional engagement approaches. Although Internet technologies are new, the practice of engaging citizens in urban development processes is not. This study contains a critical re-evaluation of planning participation history and theory in order to propose ways Internet tools can be used to realize more inclusive, democratic, and equitable planning processes.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="http://goodspeedupdate.com/e-democracy-in-urban-planning">Internet tools for e-democracy in urban planning</a></strong></p>
<p>This page describes how planners could use internet tools to enhance the practice of planning. Used efficiently, Internet tools could enhance the quality of public debate about planning issues, engage and mobilize previously apathetic citizens, and facilitate the planning process. While face-to-face communications and traditional public engagement methods like public meetings and published reports will continue to be important, they can and should be supplemented with online information and communication.</p>
<p><em>(via <a href="http://delicious.com/cityofsound#2009-01-04">cityofsound</a>)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/citizen-participation-and-the-internet-in-urban-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC to launch &#8216;Democracy Live&#8217; political webcasting service</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/bbc-to-launch-democracy-live-political-webcasting-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/bbc-to-launch-democracy-live-political-webcasting-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[political action]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC is to launch a political webcasting platform known as Democracy Live, Helen Boaden, Director of News at the BBC, told delegates at Headstar&#8217;s E-Democracy &#8216;08 conference in London this month.
The site &#8220;will offer live and on-demand video from all the main UK institutions and the European Parliament. Users will be able to search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC is to launch a political webcasting platform known as Democracy Live, Helen Boaden, Director of News at the BBC, told delegates at <a href="http://www.headstar.com/egblive/?p=173">Headstar&#8217;s E-Democracy &#8216;08 conference</a> in London this month.</p>
<p>The site &#8220;will offer live and on-demand video from all the main UK institutions and the European Parliament. Users will be able to search across the video for representatives and issues that are relevant to them. They will be able to find out more about their representatives in the institutions and follow their contributions,&#8221; Boaden said.</p>
<p>The site will also provide information on how the institutions of UK government work and what powers they have, as well as providing a resource of must know information concerning the issues in the news. &#8220;And while this will make for a compelling mix on the site, we also want it to be a shareable resource, with video and text content that users can take and place on their own sites or blogs,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>In her keynote speech, Boaden focused on the role of citizen journalism enabled by new technologies in a modern democratic free press.</p>
<p>&#8220;Today, and increasingly in the future, audiences want the news at the time they want it; on the platform most convenient to them and tailored to the subjects or agenda they find most appealing…and for audiences who want to join in, that means including them in the process of making the news.</p>
<p>&#8220;The London tube bombings of July 2005 brought the realisation that news gathering had changed forever, she said. It introduced citizen journalism on an unprecedented scale fuelled by the use of mobile camera and video phones. Within 24 hours of the attacks, the BBC had received 1,000 stills and videos, 3,000 texts and 20,000 e-mails.</p>
<p>The technology also gives organisations like the BBC footage that would be difficult to obtain otherwise, for example the BBC is barred from entering Burma but when the protests erupted last year they were bombarded by emails, pictures, texts and video from citizens observing the events.</p>
<p>The importance of user-generated content (UGC) is now reflected in the creation of the UGC Hub -&#8221;a seven-day, 24-hour operation at the heart of our newsroom&#8221;.</p>
<p>Boaden&#8217;s speech is available in full on the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/11/the_role_of_citizen_journalism.html">BBC editor&#8217;s blog</a>.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://www.egovnews.org/?p=4326">e-Government News</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/bbc-to-launch-democracy-live-political-webcasting-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With text-messaging, government goes mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/with-text-messaging-government-goes-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/with-text-messaging-government-goes-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going online from a personal computer to access government services has been commonplace in some countries for several years. Now, in Estonia, Singapore and many countries in between, many of those same services are available through your cellphone.
&#8220;In emerging markets in particular, governments understand that E-gov services simply won&#8217;t reach the masses unless they become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going online from a personal computer to access government services has been commonplace in some countries for several years. Now, in Estonia, Singapore and many countries in between, many of those same services are available through your cellphone.</p>
<p>&#8220;In emerging markets in particular, governments understand that E-gov services simply won&#8217;t reach the masses unless they become M-gov services,&#8221; said Gabriel Solomon, senior vice president for public policy at the GSM Association, an industry group representing cellphone operators. &#8220;Across sub-Saharan Africa, the fixed-line and PC infrastructure is only available for the elite, whereas the mobile access platform is near-ubiquitous.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/21/technology/wireless22.php">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/with-text-messaging-government-goes-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Participative democracy - European civic days</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/participative-democracy-european-civic-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/participative-democracy-european-civic-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate/forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[project site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When young activist associations met up in September 2008 at La Rochelle, democracy and engagement proved to be further slices of the &#8216;Eutopia&#8217; cake.
Read full story
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/civicdays-300x228.jpg" alt="European civic days" title="civicdays" width="300" height="228" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />When young activist associations met up in September 2008 at La Rochelle, democracy and engagement proved to be further slices of the &#8216;Eutopia&#8217; cake.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cafebabel.com/eng/article/26346/participative-democracy-citizenship-young-activist.html">Read full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/participative-democracy-european-civic-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet for everyone in Jun, Granada</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/internet-for-everyone-in-jun-granada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/internet-for-everyone-in-jun-granada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[example]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[project site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past ten years, the Granada locality of Jun has become a cybernetic laboratory for the whole of Europe. 
Based on the premise that &#8216;everybody has the right to the internet&#8217;, the city council of this 3, 500 strong town is a perfect example of the optimisation of resources and effective administration: no more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/jun_spain.jpg" alt="Jun Spain" title="jun_spain" width="355" height="266" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;"  />Over the past ten years, the Granada locality of Jun has become a cybernetic laboratory for the whole of Europe. </p>
<p>Based on the premise that &#8216;everybody has the right to the internet&#8217;, the city council of this 3, 500 strong town is a perfect example of the optimisation of resources and effective administration: no more mile-long queues to fill out endless official documents.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cafebabel.com/eng/article/26830/jun-granada-town-internet-savvy.html">Read full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/internet-for-everyone-in-jun-granada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-democracy: who dares?</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/e-democracy-who-dares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/e-democracy-who-dares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Council of Europe Forum for the Future of Democracy hosted by the Government of Spain and the City of MadridMadrid, Spain, 15–17 October 2008
Conclusions by the General Rapporteurs
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/councilofeurope.jpg" alt="" title="councilofeurope" width="240" height="213" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;"  />Council of Europe Forum for the Future of Democracy hosted by the Government of Spain and the City of MadridMadrid, Spain, 15–17 October 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://www.egovnews.org/?p=4319">Conclusions by the General Rapporteurs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/e-democracy-who-dares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Everyday Democracy Index</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate/forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[project site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/edi2.jpg' alt=''Everyday Democracy Index" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;"  />What are the most democratic countries in Europe? How would we find out? We could look at electoral turnouts. But while elections matter, Demos, the UK think tank, doesn;t believe that democracy is something that should start and finish at the ballot box.<br />
<br />
That’s why Demos has developed the Everyday Democracy Index (EDI) [<a href="http://www.everydaydemocracy.co.uk/">interactive website</a> - <a href="http://www.everydaydemocracy.co.uk/EDI.pdf">pamphlet</a> - <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/theeverydaydemocracyindex/overview">project site</a> - <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/files/File/EDIBrussels.pdf">presentation</a>].<br />
<br />
The EDI is a tool for assessing the democratic health of European countries across many different dimensions. That includes not just formal dimensions of democracy but also more everyday features of democracy – how important democratic principles and practices are to the cultures of workplaces, to people’s community life, to the way they interact with public services, and even to the way they talk to their friends and family.<br />
<br />
The pamphlet sets out the argument and methodology behind the first EDI, which covers 25 countries in the European Union area. Europe is home to some of the world’s oldest democracies as well as some of its youngest. Across many of them the same debates are gathering momentum: Why are people voting less? Why are political party memberships dropping? Why is trust in politics so low?<br />
<br />
There are other democracy indices out there, but whilst they may be good at identifying the differences between, say, Belgium and Burkina Faso, they are less good at revealing the contrast between democratic experiences in Finland and France. Starting with Europe, Demos hope to begin a new conversation about democracy where they leave off, with countries around the world.<br />
<br />
&#8220;We need to connect these debates, we need to invigorate them and we need a new starting point.  This is what the Everyday Democracy Index aims to achieve.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WikiDemocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wikidemocracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wikidemocracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[example]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wikidemocracy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WikiDemocracy is the first experiment in the world to write the parties&#8217; programs bottom-up.

It is still under development and focused on Italy, but we plan to internationalize it as soon as possible. If you wish to cooperate in order to translate some pages, if you want to support with donations, and/or you are a no-profit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/wikidemocracy.png" alt="WikiDemocracy" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" /><a href="http://www.wikidemocracy.org/wiki/about_eng">WikiDemocracy</a> is the first experiment in the world to write the parties&#8217; programs bottom-up.<br />
<br />
It is still under development and <a href="http://www.wikidemocracy.org/wiki/about">focused on Italy</a>, but we plan to internationalize it as soon as possible. If you wish to cooperate in order to translate some pages, if you want to support with donations, and/or you are a no-profit organization and willing to support us for deployment in other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wikidemocracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big barrier to e-democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-big-barrier-to-e-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-big-barrier-to-e-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate/forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-big-barrier-to-e-democracy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK government is keen for local government to harness technology to revolutionise its services; but a culture change is needed first, says The Guardian newspaper.

The government is providing ever more pilot schemes and opportunities to engage but increasingly fewer people believe that &#8220;getting involved&#8221; is a good use of their time.

This results in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/joepublic/logo.gif" alt="Joe Public" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />The UK government is keen for local government to harness technology to revolutionise its services; but a culture change is needed first, says The Guardian newspaper.<br />
</p>
<blockquote><p>The government is providing ever more pilot schemes and opportunities to engage but increasingly fewer people believe that &#8220;getting involved&#8221; is a good use of their time.<br />
<br />
This results in the same people who are already active citizens being offered many more opportunities to engage, whereas the individuals who have not engaged are not benefiting from these new opportunities. So just because new channels of engagement are built, they will not necessarily be used by new participants.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/joepublic/2008/02/the_big_barrier_to_edemocracy.html">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-big-barrier-to-e-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economist special report on electronic government</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/economist-special-report-on-electronic-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/economist-special-report-on-electronic-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate/forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/economist-special-report-on-electronic-government/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Economist has published a special report on technology and the public sector.

Why is it, they ask, that business succeeds on the web and government mostly fails?

In the leader article, they argue that the three main reasons are lack of competitive pressure, a tendency to reinvent the wheel and a focus on technology rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.economist.com/images/20080216/D0708SR1.jpg" alt="Technology and the public sector" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />The Economist has published a <a href="http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10638002">special report on technology and the public sector</a>.<br />
<br />
Why is it, they ask, that business succeeds on the web and government mostly fails?<br />
<br />
In the <a href="http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10689634">leader article</a>, they argue that the three main reasons are lack of competitive pressure, a tendency to reinvent the wheel and a focus on technology rather than organisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/economist-special-report-on-electronic-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Everyday Democracy Index</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[project site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the UK think tank Demos launched the Everyday Democracy Index (EDI).

The EDI is an original and innovative tool for assessing the democratic health of European countries beyond the ballot box and across many different dimensions. That includes the formal dimensions of democracy, like procedural rights and election turnout. But it also includes more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/edi1.jpg" alt="PEveryday Democracy Index" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />Last week, the UK think tank Demos launched the <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/theeverydaydemocracyindex/overview">Everyday Democracy Index</a> (EDI).<br />
<br />
The EDI is an original and innovative tool for assessing the democratic health of European countries beyond the ballot box and across many different dimensions. That includes the formal dimensions of democracy, like procedural rights and election turnout. But it also includes more everyday features of democracy – how important democratic principles and practices are to the cultures of workplaces, to people’s community life, to the way they interact with public services, and even to the way they talk to their friends and family.<br />
<br />
The first index covers 25 EU countries.<br />
<br />
To see the results and read the pamphlet, visit the <strong><a href="http://www.everydaydemocracy.co.uk/">interactive website</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/the-everyday-democracy-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government website survey: from organization-centric to citizen-centric</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-website-survey-from-organization-centric-to-citizen-centric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-website-survey-from-organization-centric-to-citizen-centric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[debate/forum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-website-survey-from-organization-centric-to-citizen-centric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government websites are organization-centric, complicated and confusing, according to a survey of government web professionals in the United States, New Zealand and Canada, writes Gerry McGovern on his blog New Thinking.

Governments are addicted to proving that they are doing their job properly. Many government websites are politics-centric. They talk about the 5-year plans they have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government websites are organization-centric, complicated and confusing, according to a survey of government web professionals in the United States, New Zealand and Canada, writes Gerry McGovern on his blog New Thinking.<br />
<br />
Governments are addicted to proving that they are doing their job properly. Many government websites are politics-centric. They talk about the 5-year plans they have just launched, rather than using the website to help implement the 5-year plan.<br />
<br />
Too many government websites tell us about what their political masters did. With soft focus pictures we are told that the minister has just arrived down for breakfast. Oh, look, he sat down and is reaching for the toast. I wonder will he have marmalade or honey this morning. (I really care about his diet.)<br />
<br />
Too many government websites tell us about the legislation they are enacting. We are victims of a tsunami of policies, procedures and publications in a language that is often meaningless.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.gerrymcgovern.com/nt/2007/nt-2007-10-22-survey-government.htm">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/government-website-survey-from-organization-centric-to-citizen-centric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People and Participation.net</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/people-and-participationnet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/people-and-participationnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[example]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[project site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/people-and-participationnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Involve, a UK-based independent organisation focused on the practicalities of giving more power to ordinary people, just launched a new participation website.

People and Participation.net is a new radical resource to help people across the UK influence Government decision-making. The site combines the strengths of an expert guide to participation with interactivity and inclusiveness of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/participation.jpg" alt="People and Participation" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" /><a href="http://www.involve.org.uk/">Involve</a>, a UK-based independent organisation focused on the practicalities of giving more power to ordinary people, just launched a new participation website.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.peopleandparticipation.net">People and Participation.net</a></strong> is a new radical resource to help people across the UK influence Government decision-making. The site combines the strengths of an expert guide to participation with interactivity and inclusiveness of a wiki.<br />
<br />
Key features include:</p>
<ul>
<li>An interactive tool which helps practitioners to select participatory methods based on their specific circumstances</li>
<li>A comprehensive methods database, covering over 30 traditional and innovative approaches to public participation from around the world</li>
<li>A selection of case studies, showcasing good practice and allowing site users to post their own success stories to inspire others</li>
<li>A section for site users to post their questions about participation. Involve staff will respond to these questions and thereby create an ever growing knowledge bank of answers to common.</li>
<li>News and events information from the UK and beyond</li>
<li>A comprehensive library of written and web-based resources from around the world to help site users make sense of public participation</li>
</ul>
<p>
It has been designed by social media specialists <a href="http://www.headshift.com/">Headshift</a>, with funding from a couple of UK Government departments. Involve hopes that the site will be a creative space where officials, councillors and citizens can share their success stories. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/people-and-participationnet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Zealand police let public write laws</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/new-zealand-police-let-public-write-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/new-zealand-police-let-public-write-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Oceania]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/new-zealand-police-let-public-write-laws/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Zealanders have been given the chance to write their own laws, with a new online tool launched by police.

The &#8220;wiki&#8221; will allow the public to suggest the wording of a new police act, as part of a government review of the current law, written in 1958.

Police say they hope to gain a range of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Zealanders have been given the chance to write their own laws, with a new online tool launched by police.<br />
<br />
The &#8220;<a href="http://wiki.policeact.govt.nz/">wiki</a>&#8221; will allow the public to suggest the wording of a new police act, as part of a government review of the current law, written in 1958.<br />
<br />
Police say they hope to gain a range of views from the public on the new law before presenting it to parliament.<br />
<br />
The wiki, one of the first of its kind in the world, is open to any internet user, police say.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7015024.stm">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/new-zealand-police-let-public-write-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU benchmark shows mixed results on user experience of online public services</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/eu-benchmark-shows-mixed-results-on-user-experience-of-online-public-services/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/eu-benchmark-shows-mixed-results-on-user-experience-of-online-public-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[disabled]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/eu-benchmark-shows-mixed-results-on-user-experience-of-online-public-services/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year, the EU Benchmark Survey assesses the quality of online public services in Europe. For the first time, the survey also looked at the users experience when accessing on-line public services, in recognition of the growing importance of this topic, and found mixed results.
From the press release:
&#8220;The survey examined three elements which are important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image209" src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/eeurope_logo.thumbnail.gif" alt="eeurope_logo.gif" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />Every year, the <strong>EU Benchmark Survey</strong> assesses the quality of online public services in Europe. For the first time, the survey also looked at the users experience when accessing on-line public services, in recognition of the growing importance of this topic, and found mixed results.</p>
<p class="body">From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p class="body">&#8220;The survey examined three elements which are important to the user experience: the provision of a legally recognised, secure electronic identity, whether the service could be accessed via alternative channels such as call centres, kiosks, mobile phones and TV, and compliance of the websites with the International Accessibility Guidelines. The overall result for this indicator is more mixed and reaches 19%, with Austria, Bulgaria and Norway scoring above 30%. The most striking finding was that only 5% of websites make a specific reference to their compliance with international accessibility guidelines (WAI).</p>
<p class="body">National portals fared much better. The report looked at the number of basic public services which can be accessed from the portal, the existence of personalised options, ease of navigation and whether its presentation is targeted at different kinds of users (businesses vs. citizens, around life events or around the structure of the administration). The overall score of 75% demonstrates that national governments consider the national portal as one of the cornerstones of their eGovernment plans.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="body">However the report itself puts some further qualification (page 27) on the above optimistic assessment of the user experience of national portals:</p>
<blockquote><p class="body">&#8220;We conclude that the national portals are well developed as user-centric gateways to public service delivery points.</p>
<p class="body">However on the level of the transactional services itself, the agencies, the e-services delivery is <strong>still primarily organised around the needs of governmental organization more than around the needs of the users, being citizens and business</strong>. [My emphasis]</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="body">The survey, carried out for the European Commission by consultants Capgemini, examined over 14,000 web sites offering 20 basic public services in the 27 EU Member States plus Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Turkey. In 2007 the online sophistication of public service delivery reached an overall score of 76%, while 58% of the measured public services are fully available online.</p>
<p class="body">Austria stands out both on sophistication and full on-line availability, with scores of 99 and 100% respectively. Portugal has made major progress since 2006 and Malta and Slovenia stand out as countries that have embraced eGovernment and advanced online service delivery and therefore top the charts in 2007.</p>
<p class="body">- <strong><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/itemlongdetail.cfm?item_id=3634">Read press release</a></strong><br />
- <strong><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/egov_benchmark_2007.pdf">Download report</a></strong> (pdf, 15 mb, 123 pages)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/eu-benchmark-shows-mixed-results-on-user-experience-of-online-public-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harnessing the Internet to reinvent democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/harnessing-the-internet-to-reinvent-democracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/harnessing-the-internet-to-reinvent-democracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[example]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[locations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[teenagers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/208/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Management guru Don Tapscott, the co-author of best-seller &#8220;Wikinomics&#8221;, wants to teach governments to harness the power of the Internet to reinvent democracy.

Tapscott is an evangelist for Web 2.0, the second-generation Internet based on participation through social communities such as Facebook and MySpace, participatory sites like free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and blogs.

 In &#8220;Wikinomics: How Mass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image207" src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/tapscott.jpg" alt="tapscott.jpg" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />Management guru Don Tapscott, the co-author of best-seller &#8220;Wikinomics&#8221;, wants to teach governments to harness the power of the Internet to reinvent democracy.<br />
<br />
Tapscott is an evangelist for Web 2.0, the second-generation Internet based on participation through social communities such as Facebook and MySpace, participatory sites like free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and blogs.<br />
<br />
 In &#8220;Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything,&#8221; published this year, he and co-author Anthony Williams dared big companies to reveal their trade secrets on the Web in a gamble to collect the ideas they need from people outside the firm.<br />
<br />
Now their thinktank, New Paradigm, is starting a project to involve governments, non-governmental organizations and citizens around the world to revitalize the public sector.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUKGOR15628620070911">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/harnessing-the-internet-to-reinvent-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Public Scrutiny: Stocktaking of Social Accountability in OECD countries</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/beyond-public-scrutiny-stocktaking-of-social-accountability-in-oecd-countries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/beyond-public-scrutiny-stocktaking-of-social-accountability-in-oecd-countries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[example]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/beyond-public-scrutiny-stocktaking-of-social-accountability-in-oecd-countries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto sent us a link to this report presenting the results of a joint OECD-World Bank stocktaking of social accountability initiatives in OECD countries. The report which was written by Peixoto, together with Joanne Caddy and Mary McNeil is part of OECD&#8217;s efforts to identify emerging trends and develop policy lessons for countries seeking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiago Peixoto sent us a link to this report presenting the results of a joint OECD-World Bank stocktaking of social accountability initiatives in OECD countries. The report which was written by Peixoto, together with Joanne Caddy and Mary McNeil is part of OECD&#8217;s efforts to identify emerging trends and develop policy lessons for countries seeking to build more open, accountable and responsive government. </p>
<blockquote><p>OECD countries have done much to enhance government openness and encourage citizen engagement and participation throughout the past two decades.<br />
<br />
Although countries now understand that a whole-of-government perspective is necessary to ensure that system-wide impacts are considered, planning and implementation issues remain. This stocktaking of social accountability initiatives aims to collect information about existing initiatives and country experiences, in an effort to help countries meet these challenges while building more open, accountable and responsive government.<br />
<br />
This exercise generated 40 templates detailing social accountability initiatives in 27 OECD countries, and the European Commission. Cases were selected based on focus, level of government, and transferability of policy lessons. The group as a whole illustrates the wealth of innovative practices currently available, and provides a rich resource for practitioners.<br />
<br />
Several cases explored the use of online tools to enhance public scrutiny and engagement:<br />
- Canada: Online Pre-Budget Consultation (p. 44)<br />
- Denmark: <a href="http://www.danmarksdebatten.dk/">Danmarksdebatten</a> [currently part of <a href="http://e-demokrati.borger.dk/">Borger.dk</a>] (p. 55)<br />
- Germany: <a href="http://www.zebralog.de/en/000125.html">Online Dialogue Participatory Budgeting</a> (p. 72)<br />
- Hungary: <a href="http://www.magyarorszag.hu/rewriter/forumegames/kapcsolat/parbeszed/egames.html">e-Games</a> (p. 81)<br />
- European Union: e-Agora (p. 164)</p></blockquote>
<p>- <strong><a href="http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_2649_201185_38983243_1_1_1_1,00.html">Full abstract</a></strong><br />
- <strong><a href="http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/43/3/38983242.pdf">Download publication</a></strong> (pdf, 1.2 mb, 196 pages)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/beyond-public-scrutiny-stocktaking-of-social-accountability-in-oecd-countries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relooking at democractic processes in the light of new age technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/relooking-at-democractic-processes-in-the-light-of-new-age-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/relooking-at-democractic-processes-in-the-light-of-new-age-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[example]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy makers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/relooking-at-democractic-processes-in-the-light-of-new-age-technologies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The method of selecting representatives for presenting the view of a constituency was deployed at the time when internet and mobile technologies were not available and there was no method of making a collective decision on policies to government the society.

In today&#8217;s times , most of the population have mobile phones that can be used [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image204" src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/mgovernment.jpg" alt="mgovernment.jpg" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />The method of selecting representatives for presenting the view of a constituency was deployed at the time when internet and mobile technologies were not available and there was no method of making a collective decision on policies to government the society.<br />
<br />
In today&#8217;s times , most of the population have mobile phones that can be used by the citizens to communicate their opinion on important policy issues. Should not we therefore relook at the ways of people representation and amend the democratic processes accordingly?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mgovworld.org/"><strong>m-GovWorld</strong></a> is an Indian initiative to create an observatory for mobile government developments and developing a community of stakeholders with the aim to enable acceleration of adoption of mobile technologies by government agencies.<br />
<br />
The comments from readers are welcome to suggest innovative ways of making democracy more vibrant using mobile technologies where citizens can be continuously involved in policy decisions rather than voting once in five years.<br />
<br />
<em>(via <a href="http://www.mobileactive.org/relooking-democractic-pr">MobileActive.org</a>)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/relooking-at-democractic-processes-in-the-light-of-new-age-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrecy and the perils of technocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/secrecy-and-the-perils-of-technocracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/secrecy-and-the-perils-of-technocracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Experientia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/secrecy-and-the-perils-of-technocracy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their most recent book, Don Tapscott and David Ticoll introduce us to the &#8220;age of transparency&#8221; [book site &#124; blog &#124; amazon page].  They argue that corporations and governments face unrelenting pressures for greater openness that will only increase - and that the costs of resistance far outweigh those of more proactive forms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image202" src="http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/wp-content/uploads/naked_corporation.jpg" alt="naked_corporation.jpg" style="float:right; padding-left: 10px;" />In their most recent book, Don Tapscott and David Ticoll introduce us to the &#8220;age of transparency&#8221; [<a href="http://www.ageoftransparency.com/">book site</a> | <a href="http://www.ageoftransparency.com/blog/">blog</a> | <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Naked-Corporation-Transparency-Revolutionize-Business/dp/0743246500">amazon page</a>].  They argue that corporations and governments face unrelenting pressures for greater openness that will only increase - and that the costs of resistance far outweigh those of more proactive forms of disclosure. Of course, for many organizations this latter path points to an adaptive challenge of immense proportions.<br />
<br />
There are also indications that governments are not only unprepared to adapt, but intent on resisting more openness. Such a claim may at first glance appear out of step with reality; during the first week of July alone, the [US] federal government’s main portal provided more than 200 What’s New announcements. Agencies now routinely publish annual reports detailing their activities and performance, and e-government continues to facilitate online access to more sources of information and programs.<br />
<br />
Yet all these examples are elements of a government’s communication apparatus, controlled by central agencies and filtered by political operatives to ensure as much good news as possible. While there is nothing inherently wrong with those in power wanting to be seen to be using it wisely (with an eye to retaining it), troubles mount when other sources of information - multiplying through a ubiquitous media and communications infrastructure - take issue with the government’s message.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.egovnews.org/?p=2311">Read full story</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experientia.com/edemocracy/secrecy-and-the-perils-of-technocracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
