|
7 March 2008
|
|
4 Responses to “Is user-generated content out?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. |
Experientia news
Humin
Experientia is proud to announce the official launch of Humin, a programme developed for Flemish ...
Experientia is proud to announce the official launch of Humin, a programme developed for Flemish ...
Turin Disability
On 19 March the non-profit organisation Area, which supports families with disabled children, will ...
On 19 March the non-profit organisation Area, which supports families with disabled children, will ...
Two Experientia workshops
Experientia, in collaboration with the Vodafone User Experience team, is running two workshops on ...
Experientia, in collaboration with the Vodafone User Experience team, is running two workshops on ...
Usability and design
Over 250 participants are expected to attend the first European regional conference of the ...
Over 250 participants are expected to attend the first European regional conference of the ...
Putting people first
is powered by WordPress
is powered by WordPress



I think Newsweek’s thinly veiled derision of user-generated content has less to do with factual accuracy, and more to do with gadfly amateurs (and even unpaid experts) who challenge their credibility and have imposed a level of accountability some aren’t comfortable with.
Perhaps it help if Newsweek made the distinction between experts versus professionals in this article. An expert, by definition, knows what they are talking about. The professional, on the other hand, is paid to generate content. You can combine the two. But then you run the risk of getting a skewed perspective of someone with a skin in the game who might have an incentive to deceive or make omissions.
Beal’s quote: “People are beginning to recognize that the world is too dangerous a place for faulty information”. The same could be about magazines and consumer strategists who typically cater to someone or something other than their audience. Read this line from her company’s website and you might get an idea of what I mean; “We put the consumer at the center of your world, so you can strike at the center of theirs. Proximity is power. We’ll take you there.”
Questionable judgement and motivations have undermined my trust more than bad advice. The value of additional, or [any] outside perspective is often omitted in the professionals’ coverage of user-generated content. We’re just seeing the beginning, not the end.
Yes, I made some typos. “Perhaps it would help” and “The same could be said about”. Maybe if I had a better editing tool than a comment box, I could compete with pros.
I agree with the implications of your post. I would rather have the advice of an expert, because inferior information is problematic no matter what the source.
The upside of user-generated content is the heightened level of scrutiny it places on all who generate it. In my opinion it actually aids in improving information literacy by exposing people to mere exisitence of another point of view.
Health Information is a perfect example of how egregious the pros and experts can be. Look at the recent decision by Pfizer to pull the deceptive Lipitor ads featuring Dr. Jarvik.
Usa Today
SourceWatch
What other choices do we have when the pros and experts are in on the deception?
[...] link via Putting People First addthis_url = [...]